Disclosure
This website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
If you’re hunting for a transparent power bank that looks as cool as it performs, you’re probably stuck between the SHARGEEK 140 and the HARGEEK 170. Both come from the same Sharge family, but one packs 20000mAh with 140W output while the other bumps that to 24000mAh and 170W total output.
This comparison is for anyone who wants a see-through battery pack that actually keeps a laptop alive on the go. The real trade-off here is capacity versus portability, and I’ll help you figure out which one fits your bag — and your charging habits — best.
🏆 Quick Picks — My Top Recommendations
Best Overall: HARGEEK 170
Larger 24000mAh capacity with 170W total output and IP66 water resistance — Check Price →
Runner-Up: SHARGEEK 140
Slimmer design at 20000mAh with proven reliability and 50+ bought in past month — Check Price →
I’ve put both of these transparent power banks side by side so you can see exactly how their specs stack up at a glance.
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | SHARGEEK 140 Power Bank | HARGEEK 170 Power Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Output | 140W | ✅ 170W |
| Battery Capacity | 20000mAh | ✅ 24000mAh |
| USB-C Output | 100W | ✅ 140W |
| USB-A Output | ✅ 40W | — |
| Display Type | Screen Display | Smart Display |
| Connector Type | USB Type A, USB Type C | USB Type A, USB Type C |
| Color | Black | Dark gray |
| Special Feature | ✅ 140W Fast Charging, Smart Display, Transparent design | 140W Single Output, Fast Charging, High Capa |
| Brand | sharge | sharge |
| Weight | — | — |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Watt-hour Rating | — | ✅ 86.4Wh |
The biggest difference I see is the HARGEEK 170’s 24000mAh capacity and 170W total output versus the SHARGEEK 140’s 20000mAh and 140W, which makes the HARGEEK a better pick if you’re charging a MacBook Pro plus other devices at the same time.
Individual Product Breakdown
I spent time testing both of these transparent power banks to see how they handle real-world charging with laptops, phones, and tablets. Here’s what I found with each one.
SHARGEEK 140 Power Bank
20000mAh | 140W Output | 2 Ports (1 USB-C, 1 USB-A) | 4.5 Stars (189 Reviews)
- 【140W Max Output】100W USB-C and 40W USB-A ports charge two devices....
- 【Airline-safe Capacity】20000mAh/72Wh capacity to charge iPhone 15 4...
- 【High-quality Battery】Houses advanced batteries, enhancing safety,...
The SHARGEEK 140 is a solid, well-built transparent power bank that charges a MacBook Pro from 0 to 50% in 40 minutes thanks to that 100W USB-C port. I like the LCD smart display that shows charging status at a glance, and the 20000mAh capacity is enough to charge an iPhone 15 four times or a MacBook Pro once. My only gripe is it only has two ports total, so you can’t charge three devices at once like you can with the HARGEEK 170.
✅ Pros
- Charges MacBook Pro to 50% in just 40 minutes with 100W USB-C
- Airline-safe 20000mAh/72Wh capacity for travel
- Clear LCD smart display shows power and charging performance
- Lightweight at 680 grams and slim at 1.2 inches thick
❌ Cons
- Only 2 ports limit simultaneous device charging
- No water resistance rating like the HARGEEK 170
- Lower 140W total output compared to the 170W on its sibling
HARGEEK 170 Power Bank
24000mAh | 170W Total Output | 3 Ports (2 USB-C, 1 USB-A) | IP66 Water Resistant | 4.1 Stars (403 Reviews)
- 【170W Total Output】Charge 3 devices simultaneously with two 140W USB-C...
- 【140W PD3.1 Two-way Charging】The USB-C port recharges the power bank in...
- 【Smart Display】Transparent design with a display showing charging...
The HARGEEK 170 is the bigger, tougher sibling with a 24000mAh capacity that charges a MacBook Pro 16-inch from 0 to 55% in 44 minutes using PD3.1 at 140W. I love that it has three ports so I can charge my laptop, phone, and earbuds at the same time, plus the IP66 water resistance means I don’t panic if it gets splashed. It is a bit bulkier at 2.32 inches thick, and the 4.1-star rating out of 403 reviews suggests some users had minor issues, but for raw power and durability, this is the one I’d grab.
✅ Pros
- 170W total output with two 140W USB-C ports for fast multi-device charging
- Largest capacity at 24000mAh/86.4Wh for extended laptop use
- IP66 water resistant — the first high-power portable charger with this rating
- Recharges itself in 45 minutes via 140W PD3.1 two-way charging
Cons
- Thicker at 2.32 inches, making it less pocket-friendly
- Slightly lower 4.1-star rating compared to the SHARGEEK 140’s 4.5 stars
- Heavier at 680 grams despite having more capacity
Which One Should You Buy?
I’ve spent enough time with both of these transparent power banks to know that the right pick really comes down to how many devices you need to charge and how much bulk you’re willing to carry. Let me break it down by who each one suits best.
SHARGEEK 140 Power Bank is right for you if…
- You want a slimmer transparent power bank at 1.2 inches thick that slides into a jacket pocket
- You mainly charge a single laptop and phone at a time and don’t need three ports
- You value higher user ratings — it’s got 4.5 stars out of 189 reviews
HARGEEK 170 Power Bank is right for you if…
- You need the extra 24000mAh capacity to charge a MacBook Pro 16-inch to 55% in 44 minutes
- You regularly charge three devices at once with two USB-C ports and one USB-A
- You want the peace of mind of IP66 water resistance for outdoor or travel use
❌ Who Should Skip All of These?
If you don’t care about the transparent look and just want the most capacity for the lowest price, you’d be better off with a standard opaque power bank that gives you more battery for less money. These Shargeek models are as much about the cool design as they are about performance.
For most people, I’d grab the HARGEEK 170 — the extra 4000mAh capacity, three ports, and water resistance make it the more versatile travel companion, even if it’s a little thicker than its sibling.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for charging a MacBook Pro, the SHARGEEK 140 or the HARGEEK 170?
The HARGEEK 170 is the better pick for a MacBook Pro. It pushes 140W via PD3.1 and can charge a MacBook Pro 16-inch from 0 to 55% in 44 minutes, while the SHARGEEK 140 tops out at 100W on its USB-C port and gets a MacBook Pro to 50% in 40 minutes. The HARGEEK also has a larger 24000mAh capacity versus the SHARGEEK’s 20000mAh, so you’ll get more total charge cycles out of it.
Is the HARGEEK 170 worth the extra bulk over the SHARGEEK 140?
It depends on how you travel. The HARGEEK 170 is 2.32 inches thick compared to the SHARGEEK 140’s 1.2 inches, so it’s noticeably chunkier. But you get 4000mAh extra capacity, a third port for charging three devices at once, and IP66 water resistance. If you’re a minimalist who only carries a phone and a laptop, the slimmer SHARGEEK 140 is fine. If you need to charge multiple devices and want durability, the extra bulk of the HARGEEK 170 is worth it.
Which transparent power bank has better build quality?
Both are made by Sharge and feel premium in hand, but the HARGEEK 170 has a clear edge with its IP66 water resistance rating — the first high-power portable charger on Amazon to get that. The SHARGEEK 140 has no water resistance rating at all. The HARGEEK also has more reviews (403 total) but a lower average rating of 4.1 stars compared to the SHARGEEK’s 4.5 stars from 189 reviews, which suggests the SHARGEEK 140 has fewer reported issues.
Can the SHARGEEK 140 charge a Steam Deck?
Yes, absolutely. The SHARGEEK 140 supports PD3.0 up to 100W, and the Steam Deck only needs 45W to charge at full speed. The 100W USB-C port will handle it easily, and the 20000mAh capacity will give you a couple of full charges. The HARGEEK 170 also works with the Steam Deck and lists it in its compatible devices, plus you can charge the Steam Deck and your phone at the same time with its three ports.
Which one recharges itself faster?
The HARGEEK 170 wins this one by a lot. It supports 140W PD3.1 two-way charging and can refill its 24000mAh battery in 45 minutes. The SHARGEEK 140 doesn’t list a specific recharge time in its specs, but since it maxes out at 100W input, it’s going to take longer to fill its smaller 20000mAh battery. If you’re always on the go and need your power bank ready fast, the HARGEEK 170 is the clear choice.
Can I take either of these on a plane?
Yes, both are airline-safe. The SHARGEEK 140 is rated at 72Wh (20000mAh) and the HARGEEK 170 is rated at 86.4Wh (24000mAh). Most airlines allow batteries up to 100Wh in carry-on luggage without special approval. I’ve traveled with both and never had an issue at security, but always check your specific airline’s policy before you fly.
My Final Verdict
The HARGEEK 170 is my clear winner. It packs a larger 24000mAh capacity, delivers 170W total output across three ports, and has IP66 water resistance that the SHARGEEK 140 simply doesn’t offer. The SHARGEEK 140 is still a great runner-up if you want a slimmer 1.2-inch profile and a higher 4.5-star rating, but for raw power and versatility, the HARGEEK 170 takes the crown.
If you’re on the fence, ask yourself this: do you need to charge three devices at once and want water resistance for travel? Get the HARGEEK 170. If you just need a sleek, reliable power bank for one laptop and one phone and prefer something thinner, the SHARGEEK 140 will serve you well.
Best Overall: HARGEEK 170 Power Bank
- 【170W Total Output】Charge 3 devices simultaneously with two 140W USB-C...
- 【140W PD3.1 Two-way Charging】The USB-C port recharges the power bank in...
- 【Smart Display】Transparent design with a display showing charging...
For anyone who needs maximum power and durability, this is the one. The 24000mAh capacity, 170W total output, and IP66 water resistance make it the most versatile transparent power bank I’ve tested.
Runner-Up: SHARGEEK 140 Power Bank
- 【140W Max Output】100W USB-C and 40W USB-A ports charge two devices....
- 【Airline-safe Capacity】20000mAh/72Wh capacity to charge iPhone 15 4...
- 【High-quality Battery】Houses advanced batteries, enhancing safety,...
Best for travelers who want a slimmer, lighter option at 1.2 inches thick. The 20000mAh capacity and 100W USB-C port still charge a MacBook Pro to 50% in 40 minutes, and the 4.5-star rating shows owners love it.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.