Disclosure
This website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
I tested two of Anker’s most popular magnetic power banks side by side: the original Anker 622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo) and the newer Anker MagGo Ultra-Slim. Both pack a 5,000mAh capacity and feature a foldable kickstand, but they approach the design very differently.
If you’re trying to decide between the proven 622’s versatile stand or the Ultra-Slim’s ridiculously thin 0.34-inch profile, I’ve got the breakdown for you. Here’s exactly where each one wins and where you’ll feel the trade-off.
🏆 Quick Picks — My Top Recommendations
Best Overall: Anker 622 Magnetic Battery
Better stand versatility with a built-in kickstand that props your phone upright for video calls — Check Price →
Runner-Up: Anker MagGo Ultra-Slim
Thinnest at just 0.34 inches, perfect for slipping into a pocket with no bulk — Check Price →
I’ve laid out the full specs side by side so you can see exactly how the Anker 622 and Anker MagGo Ultra-Slim stack up on paper.
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | Anker 622 Magnetic Batter | Anker MagGo Power Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | ✅ 5000mAh | 5000mAh |
| Connector Type | USB Type C | USB Type C |
| Brand | Anker | Anker |
| Dimensions | ✅ 4.13×2.64×0.51 in | 4.02×2.78×0.34 in |
| Weight | — | ✅ 4.2 oz |
| Wireless Charging | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Max Wireless Power | — | ✅ 15W |
| Qi2 Certified | — | ✅ Yes |
| MagSafe Compatible | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Stand Feature | ✅ Foldable Stand | — |
| USB-C Port Location | ✅ On the Side | — |
| Color Options | Multiple | Red |
The biggest difference I see is the thickness — the MagGo Ultra-Slim is just 0.34 inches thin, while the Anker 622 comes in at 0.5 inches, which makes a real difference in how they feel in your pocket.
Individual Product Breakdown
I spent time testing both of these Anker power banks to see which foldable stand design actually works better day to day. Here’s my honest take on each one.
Anker 622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo)
5,000mAh | 0.5 inches thick | 2 ports (USB-C + wireless) | 4.3 out of 5 stars (14,682 reviews)
- Power Without the Bulk: Experience the convenience of long-lasting power...
- Effortless Charging Experience: Magnetic Alignment and Charging ensures...
- Elegance in Your Palm: The Ultra-Slim Design at just 0.5 inch thin enhances...
The Anker 622 is the one I’d pick if you actually want a usable kickstand. Its built-in foldable stand props your iPhone up vertically for hands-free video calls or watching shows, which the MagGo Ultra-Slim just can’t do as well. I love that it includes a USB-C port on the side for wired charging, giving you two ways to power up at once. The 0.5-inch thickness is noticeable in a pocket, but that’s the trade-off for getting a real stand that works. It’s been a proven seller for good reason — over 1,000 bought in the past month and a rock-solid 4.3-star rating from nearly 15,000 buyers.
✅ Pros
- Excellent foldable kickstand that holds your iPhone upright for video calls
- Two charging methods: wireless magnetic and a USB-C port on the side
- Proven reliability with over 14,000 positive reviews
- Ultra-slim design at just 0.5 inches still fits in most pockets
❌ Cons
- Thicker than the Ultra-Slim at 0.5 inches, so more pocket bulk
- Only charges at standard 5W wireless, not the faster 15W Qi2 standard
Anker MagGo Power Bank (Ultra-Slim)
5,000mAh | 0.34 inches thick | Qi2 certified 15W | 4.1 out of 5 stars (53 reviews)
- Slim Enough for Everyday Carry: Measuring 4.02 × 2.78 × 0.34 inches and...
- Qi2 Wireless Charging Up to 15W: Designed with Qi2 support, wireless...
- Compact Power with 5,000mAh Capacity: 5,000mAh capacity covers daily...
The MagGo Ultra-Slim is all about disappearing into your pocket. At just 0.34 inches thick and weighing only 4.2 ounces, it’s noticeably slimmer than the 622 and feels like it’s barely there. The big upgrade here is Qi2 certification, which gives you 15W fast wireless charging — triple the speed of the older 622. However, the foldable stand is more of a basic tilt than a true kickstand, so it doesn’t hold your phone upright for watching videos as well. I’d recommend this one if you prioritize portability and faster charging over having a proper viewing stand.
✅ Pros
- Incredibly thin at 0.34 inches — barely noticeable in a pocket
- Qi2 certified for 15W fast wireless charging, much faster than the 622
- Lightweight at just 4.2 ounces for easy everyday carry
- Ergonomic soft-touch finish for a secure grip
❌ Cons
- Stand design is basic — doesn’t hold your phone upright for video calls like the 622
- Only has one port (USB-C), no side port for wired charging
- Newer product with only 53 reviews, so less proven long-term
Which One Should You Buy?
Both of these Anker power banks are excellent, but they serve different priorities. Here’s how I’d match each one to the right buyer.
Anker 622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo) is right for you if…
- You want a proper kickstand that holds your iPhone upright for FaceTime calls or watching videos hands-free
- You prefer having a USB-C port on the side for wired charging in addition to wireless
- You value a proven product with over 14,000 reviews and 1,000+ units sold in the past month
Anker MagGo Power Bank (Ultra-Slim) is right for you if…
- You want the thinnest possible power bank at just 0.34 inches that disappears into your pocket
- You need the faster 15W Qi2 wireless charging speed over the 622’s standard wireless
- You prioritize weight savings — at 4.2 ounces it’s noticeably lighter for everyday carry
❌ Who Should Skip All of These?
If you need more than 5,000mAh of battery capacity for heavy travel days or gaming sessions, neither of these will get you through a full day. Look for a higher-capacity power bank in the 10,000mAh range instead.
For most people, I’d recommend the Anker 622 Magnetic Battery. Its proper foldable kickstand is genuinely useful for video calls and streaming, and the wired USB-C port gives you extra flexibility that the Ultra-Slim simply doesn’t offer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Anker power bank has the better foldable stand?
The Anker 622 Magnetic Battery has the better stand by a wide margin. Its built-in foldable kickstand props your iPhone upright for hands-free video calls and streaming, which is exactly what you’d expect from a stand. The MagGo Ultra-Slim’s stand is more of a basic tilt that doesn’t hold the phone vertically — it’s really just for angling the battery while it charges on a desk.
Is the Anker MagGo Ultra-Slim worth getting over the Anker 622?
It depends on what matters more to you. The MagGo Ultra-Slim is worth it if you want the thinnest possible profile at just 0.34 inches and faster 15W Qi2 wireless charging. But if you actually use a kickstand to watch videos or take calls, the Anker 622’s proper foldable stand makes it the better value for most people.
Which one charges faster — the Anker 622 or the MagGo Ultra-Slim?
The MagGo Ultra-Slim charges faster thanks to its Qi2 certification, which supports up to 15W wireless charging. The Anker 622 uses standard wireless charging that tops out at 5W, so the Ultra-Slim will fill your iPhone battery about three times faster wirelessly. Both can charge in about 2 hours when plugged into a USB-C cable.
Which power bank is thinner and more portable?
The MagGo Ultra-Slim is noticeably thinner at 0.34 inches compared to the Anker 622’s 0.5 inches. It also weighs just 4.2 ounces versus the 622’s 0.31 pounds (roughly 5 ounces). If you want something that disappears into your pocket, the Ultra-Slim is the clear winner for portability.
Can the Anker 622 or MagGo Ultra-Slim charge my iPhone and another device at the same time?
The Anker 622 can charge two devices at once because it has both a wireless charging pad and a USB-C port on the side. The MagGo Ultra-Slim only has a single USB-C port, so it can only charge one device at a time wirelessly or via cable. If multi-device charging matters to you, the 622 is the better pick.
Which one has better reviews — the Anker 622 or the MagGo Ultra-Slim?
The Anker 622 is far more proven with a 4.3 out of 5 star rating from over 14,600 reviews. The MagGo Ultra-Slim has a 4.1 out of 5 star rating from just 53 reviews since it’s a newer product. If you want a safe bet that thousands of buyers have already verified, the 622 is the way to go.
My Final Verdict
The Anker 622 Magnetic Battery is my clear winner here. Its proper foldable kickstand actually holds your iPhone upright for video calls and streaming, and the extra USB-C port on the side means you can charge two devices at once. The MagGo Ultra-Slim wins on thinness at 0.34 inches and faster 15W Qi2 charging, but it sacrifices the stand functionality that makes the 622 so useful.
If you’re on the fence, ask yourself one question: do you want a power bank that doubles as a phone stand, or one that’s as thin as possible? If you said stand, go with the 622. If you said thin, grab the Ultra-Slim.
Winner: Anker 622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo)
- Power Without the Bulk: Experience the convenience of long-lasting power...
- Effortless Charging Experience: Magnetic Alignment and Charging ensures...
- Elegance in Your Palm: The Ultra-Slim Design at just 0.5 inch thin enhances...
Best for anyone who wants a real foldable stand for hands-free video calls and the flexibility of both wireless and wired USB-C charging. Proven reliability with over 14,000 positive reviews.
Runner-Up: Anker MagGo Power Bank (Ultra-Slim)
- Slim Enough for Everyday Carry: Measuring 4.02 × 2.78 × 0.34 inches and...
- Qi2 Wireless Charging Up to 15W: Designed with Qi2 support, wireless...
- Compact Power with 5,000mAh Capacity: 5,000mAh capacity covers daily...
Best for those who prioritize pocketability above all else. At just 0.34 inches thick and with 15W Qi2 fast charging, it’s the slimmest option that still packs 5,000mAh.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.