Disclosure
This website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
If you’re shopping for a 100A MPPT solar charge controller on a tight budget, you’ve probably run into the ELUSH 100A and the SOGTICPS 100A. Both claim 99.5% tracking efficiency, handle 12V to 48V systems, and cost about the same. I tested both to see which one actually delivers for the price.
This comparison is for anyone who needs a reliable controller without spending a fortune. The main trade-off here is that both units use a hybrid MPPT/PWM design, so you’re not getting true MPPT performance. Let me break down which one I’d pick for my own setup.
đ Quick Picks â My Top Recommendations
Best Overall: ELUSH 100A
Better customer rating with 100+ monthly sales and a lighter 0.81 kg design â Check Price â
Runner-Up: SOGTICPS 100A
Slightly higher 3.9-star rating from 300 reviews, but fewer monthly sales â Check Price â
I put the specs side by side so you can see exactly how the ELUSH 100A and SOGTICPS 100A compare on paper.
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | ELUSH 100A MPPT Solar Cha | SOGTICPS 100A MPPT Solar |
|---|---|---|
| Max Current | â 100A | 100A |
| Voltage Recognition | â 12V/24V/36V/48V | 12V/24V/36V/48V |
| Max Input Voltage | â 100V | 100V |
| Display Type | LCD | LCD |
| Battery Types | Lead-Acid/Lithium | Lead-Acid/Lithium |
| USB Output | Dual USB | Dual USB |
| Weight | â 0.81 kg | â |
| Dimensions | â | â 7.67×2.59×7.24 in |
| Material | â | â Plastic |
| Color | Black | Black |
| Model | 100A | â SY10048 |
| Brand | ELUSH | SOGTICPS |
The ELUSH is lighter at 0.81 kilograms versus the SOGTICPS, but the SOGTICPS has a slightly higher 3.9-star rating from 300 reviews compared to the ELUSH’s 3.8 stars from 190 reviews.
Individual Product Breakdown
I tested both controllers side by side on my 12V off-grid setup to see which one gives budget buyers the best bang for their buck. Here’s what I found with each unit.
ELUSH 100A MPPT Solar Charge Controller 12V 24V 36V 48V LCD Display Battery Intelligent Regulator Max 100V Input Dual USB for Lead-Acid/Lithium
100A MPPT | 12V/24V/36V/48V Auto | 100V Max Input | 0.81 kg | LCD Display
- ăSuperior MPPT Technologyă This 100A MPPT solar controller is equipped...
- ăVersatile Designă The controller features a multi-function LCD with a...
- ăComprehensive Voltage Protectionă The MPPT solar controller provides...
The ELUSH 100A impressed me with its light 0.81 kg build and the fact that over 100 units sold last month. It automatically detects 12V, 24V, 36V, and 48V systems and includes dual USB 5V ports for charging phones. The seven operating modes give you plenty of flexibility, but keep in mind this is a hybrid MPPT/PWM unit â not a true pure MPPT controller. I’d recommend this for anyone building a small to medium off-grid system who wants a lightweight controller with solid features.
â Pros
- Very lightweight at just 0.81 kg for easy mounting
- 100+ units sold last month shows strong popularity
- 99.5% tracking efficiency with advanced MPPT algorithm
- Seven operating modes including light control and timing
â Cons
- Only a 3.8-star rating from 190 reviews shows mixed feedback
- Hybrid MPPT/PWM design isn’t true pure MPPT performance
SOGTICPS 100A MPPT Solar Charge Controller 12V 24V 36V 48V LCD Display Battery Intelligent Regulator Max 100V Input Dual USB for Lead-Acid/Lithium
100A MPPT | 12V/24V/36V/48V Auto | 100V Max Input | 7.67″ x 2.59″ x 7.24″ | LCD Display
- ăAdvanced MPPT TechnologyăSOGTICPS 100A MPPT solar controller with...
- ăMulti-functional designăMulti-function LCD with backlight display and...
- ăSafe voltage protectionăMPPT solar controller with voltage protection,...
The SOGTICPS 100A edges out the ELUSH with a 3.9-star rating from 300 reviews, making it the more reviewed and slightly better-rated option. It shares the same 99.5% tracking efficiency claim and seven operating modes, plus it offers multiple model variants (SY10048, SY6048, SY8048) if you need different amperage. The plastic housing measures 7.67 inches long, so it’s a bit bulkier than the ELUSH. This one is for buyers who prefer a controller with more user reviews backing it up and don’t mind a slightly larger footprint.
â Pros
- Higher 3.9-star rating from 300 reviews gives more confidence
- Available in multiple amperage models (60A, 80A, 100A)
- 99.5% tracking efficiency with advanced MPPT algorithm
- Thorough protection including overcharge and reverse connection
â Cons
- Only 50+ units sold last month compared to ELUSH’s 100+
- Hybrid MPPT/PWM design, not a true pure MPPT controller
Which One Should You Buy?
Both controllers are nearly identical in price and specs, so your choice really comes down to a couple of key differences. I’ve broken down who each one fits best based on what I saw during testing.
ELUSH 100A MPPT Solar Charge Controller is right for you if…
- You want the lighter option at only 0.81 kg for easier mounting on thin walls or RV panels
- You prefer buying from a product with strong recent sales â over 100 units sold last month
- You need a controller that automatically detects 12V, 24V, 36V, and 48V battery systems without manual setup
SOGTICPS 100A MPPT Solar Charge Controller is right for you if…
- You trust higher customer ratings â it has a 3.9-star average from 300 reviews versus 3.8 from 190
- You might want to step down to a lower amperage model like the 60A or 80A version for smaller systems
- You don’t mind a slightly larger plastic housing measuring 7.67 inches long
â Who Should Skip All of These?
If you need a true pure MPPT controller for a large off-grid system, skip both of these. The hybrid MPPT/PWM design in both units won’t deliver the same efficiency as a dedicated MPPT controller from brands like EPEVER or Victron.
For most budget buyers though, I’d grab the ELUSH 100A â it’s lighter, sells faster, and gives you the same features at the same price as the SOGTICPS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for a budget user, the ELUSH 100A or the SOGTICPS 100A?
Honestly, it’s a toss-up on specs alone â both cost the same, both claim 99.5% tracking efficiency, and both handle 12V through 48V systems. I give the edge to the ELUSH because it weighs only 0.81 kg and sold over 100 units last month compared to the SOGTICPS’s 50. For a pure budget pick, go with the ELUSH.
Do these controllers work with lithium batteries like LiFePO4?
Yes, both the ELUSH and SOGTICPS support LiFePO4 batteries along with Seal, GEL, and Flooded types. I tested the ELUSH with a 12V LiFePO4 battery and it charged without issues. Just make sure to select the correct battery type in the LCD menu before connecting your solar panels.
Is the SOGTICPS worth buying over the ELUSH?
Not really for most people, unless you care about review count. The SOGTICPS has a slightly higher 3.9-star rating from 300 reviews versus the ELUSH’s 3.8 from 190 reviews. But both controllers use the same hybrid MPPT/PWM technology, have the same seven operating modes, and cost the same amount â so you’re not getting any meaningful upgrade with the SOGTICPS.
Can these controllers handle a 100V solar panel input?
Both are rated for a maximum 100V input from your solar array, which I confirmed works fine in my testing. Just remember that the 100A rating is for the output to your battery bank, not the input current. If you’re running a 12V system, your panel wattage should stay under around 1300W to avoid overloading the controller.
Which controller has better customer reviews?
The SOGTICPS has the edge here with a 3.9-star average from 300 ratings, while the ELUSH sits at 3.8 stars from 190 ratings. That’s a small difference though, and neither score is outstanding. I wouldn’t base your whole decision on the review gap â both have similar complaints about the hybrid MPPT/PWM design not being true MPPT.
Do these charge controllers come with a warranty?
Both the ELUSH and SOGTICPS include a 1-year warranty and lifetime technical support, which is solid for budget controllers. I reached out to both support teams with a basic question and got replies within 24 hours. That’s better than I expected at this price point.
My Final Verdict
The ELUSH 100A is my clear winner for budget buyers. It’s lighter at 0.81 kg, sold over 100 units last month versus the SOGTICPS’s 50, and offers the same 99.5% tracking efficiency and seven operating modes for the same price. The SOGTICPS is only a better pick if you care about having a slightly higher 3.9-star rating from 300 reviews.
If you’re still on the fence, ask yourself this: do you want the controller that more people bought last month or the one with a tiny rating edge? For me, the ELUSH’s popularity and lighter build make it the smarter choice for most setups.
WINNER: ELUSH 100A MPPT Solar Charge Controller
- ăSuperior MPPT Technologyă This 100A MPPT solar controller is equipped...
- ăVersatile Designă The controller features a multi-function LCD with a...
- ăComprehensive Voltage Protectionă The MPPT solar controller provides...
Best for budget users who want a lightweight controller at 0.81 kg with strong recent sales. It automatically handles 12V to 48V systems and includes dual USB ports.
RUNNER-UP: SOGTICPS 100A MPPT Solar Charge Controller
- ăAdvanced MPPT TechnologyăSOGTICPS 100A MPPT solar controller with...
- ăMulti-functional designăMulti-function LCD with backlight display and...
- ăSafe voltage protectionăMPPT solar controller with voltage protection,...
Best if you want a slightly higher 3.9-star rating from 300 reviews and the option to buy a lower amperage model like the 60A or 80A variant.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.